Many people living with diabetes use continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) to trace their blood sugar levels. These small devices, often attached to your upper arm or the back of your stomach, send data to an app in your phone. This permits you to see in near real time how your blood sugar levels rise or fall depending on what you eat or how lively you've been.
The advantages for people living with diabetes are obvious, as failure to maintain blood sugar levels balanced could be dangerous. But these devices are being promoted as health aids to a wider community, including health-conscious non-diabetics and elite athletes.
But our own research found that the usage of these expensive devices provided little profit to healthy athletes without diabetes. And there it’s Very little research To support their use in healthy lively individuals with normal glucose control.
That said, there are several areas that warrant further research.
Do these devices profit athletes without diabetes?
If your blood sugar levels drop below the conventional range (called hypoglycemia) during endurance exercise, your athletic performance is affected.
So it's easy to see why it seems logical to trace blood glucose in real time during endurance exercise. Many people assume that this figure can signal when it's time to devour more carbohydrates during or after exercise. Carbohydrates help maintain your blood sugar levels, fueling your body to make sure it has enough energy to finish the session.
However, glucose regulation during exercise is incredibly complex. It is affected by many aspects comparable to how much and what you eat or drink, recovery and stress. Even exercise can sometimes raise your blood sugar readings. Results from the current the study Is Reported mixed up Results When exploring fueling practices (meaning what they eat and drink).
Despite enthusiastic marketing and athlete testimonials in regards to the use of continuous glucose monitors, our research concluded that there’s insufficient clear evidence to support the usage of continuous glucose monitors as a tool to optimize athlete fueling practices.
More research is required before we are able to promote these devices as useful additions to the athlete's toolbox.
What are the possible disadvantages of using a continuous glucose monitor?
The use of continuous glucose monitors presents several practical limitations.
First, they’re expensive. These monitors can cost around A$90-$100 per fortnight (because the monitors last for a maximum of 14 days) and a few mobile apps may require expensive subscriptions.
They may also be misplaced for those who're training, competing, sweating, and even doing on a regular basis tasks like showering.
It's also easy to misinterpret data, which may cause unnecessary trouble. our A preliminary study Emphasize the importance of working with a sports nutrition skilled when wearing a continuous glucose monitor to make sure you should not misinterpreting the information.
Elite athletes might also find that their sport's governing body has restrictions around these devices. For example, the world governing body for the game of cycling, International Cycling Unionhas banned the usage of continuous glucose monitors during sanctioned races.
Healthy people who are suffering from blood sugar readings.
Because these devices provide glucose readings 24 hours a day, it's also easy to stop obsessing over the information.
This may cause people to make unnecessary and overly drastic changes in eating behavior, resulting in what some doctors have termed “glucorexia.”
It's perfectly natural in your blood glucose to rise in response to eating carbohydrate-rich foods and liquids.
Worryingly, there are influencers who suggest that glucose should never “spike” and that it should at all times stay inside a really tight range, even throughout the immediate post-meal window.
In fact, it’s the rise in glucose levels outside the conventional range that may be a concern for health and well-being.
This indicates the danger of individuals without strong nutrition and physiology knowledge misinterpreting data from continuous glucose monitors.
If you’re lively and plan to try a continuous glucose monitoring device, you need to consider consulting. Approved sports nutrition So you might be properly informed about what the conventional response is.
More research is required.
Given the utility of continuous glucose monitors and the indisputable fact that they could be worn by athletes during training and at rest, we began to explore whether the information from these monitors could help elite athletes adjust their intake in response to exercise. may also help adjust.
In our study, we’re particularly considering tracking how data from continuous glucose monitors change in response to a day of coaching and eating. They may also be useful for exercise scientists trying to grasp if an athlete is overtraining.
But the fact is that the majority people should not elite athletes.
The general public who has the money to splash on these devices should understand that there isn't much research into healthy people using continuous glucose monitors.
If you’re particularly concerned about your blood sugar levels, we recommend seeing a GP and/or a nutritionist. It's higher than stressing about and testing yet one more data set that isn't particularly useful yet.